ReadingPost.Com
Political
Newsletter and Liberal Rant
Index
Page: enter
Volume
II No. 37
03-29-04
Taking
Away A Woman's Right To Choose
author:
Vance Cureton
©
Copyright 2004
There are several hot-button
political issues that drive Conservatives to distraction.
Easily accessible pornography
on the internet, the so-called Gay rights movement,
the banning of {
coerced } prayer in public schools, and legalized abortion are
at the forefront of
these cultural disagreements. Add in arguments over "the
separation of church
and state" and how much religion can be allowed to intrude
into those areas that
are under the control of the state, such as government-owned
and operated office
and residential structures, educational facilities from grade
school to the university
level, court houses and jails, and publicly-owned land.
In the last couple of
weeks an important criminal case in Utah, and the passage
of a new law in the
United States Senate, has demonstrated the means and methods
that Conservatives are
using to re-establish the state's authority over a woman's
body when she is pregnant.
Control that was greatly diminished the moment
abortion was legalized
in this country with the landmark Supreme Court decision
in Roe Vs. Wade.
The developing criminal
prosecution up in Salt Lake City is an example of how the
rights of the unborn
are being used to restrict and hinder the rights of the mother
over control of her
own body. Mellisa Ann Rowland is by all definition a pathetic
figure. She is allegedly
a dope addict, mentally unstable, and a bad mother. In the
incident that has landed
her in so much legal difficulty, she refused to have a Caesarian
performed, after repeated
warnings from medical personnel that her unborn twins
were in danger if she
did not agree to the complex procedure.
The c-section was not
performed, and one of the twins expired in the womb. Thus,
openning the door for
an overzealous prosector to file serious criminal charges against
Rowland. This is a remarkable
set of circumstances because this prosecutor is in
effect trying to establish
the precedent that if medical professional believes the
life of an unborn child
is at stake, the state can coerce a mother to submit to a
hazardous surgical procedure
that she does not want to undertake.
This kind of criminal
prosecution is far different than for example, filing charges
against a woman for
recklessly abusing alcohol or drugs during her pregnancy.
After being warned that
such actions could seriously endanger the unborn child.
This prosecutor is trying
to establish legal precedent far-afield of the above example.
What if the mother
refuses medical attention because of religious objections?
What if she wants
a second opinion?
What if the two medical
staffs, disagree?
Is the state's attorney
going to cast the deciding vote?
This
is an Orwellian nightmare in the making.-- And the political
tide in this country
is rising to the
side of the unborn fetus, against the rights of the mother to decide
what is most correct
for her situation.
But is there any doubt
that in all of these far-reaching prosecutions that the real
political target is
Roe Vs. Wade? And that these cases are being used to diminish
the rights of women
established under that Supreme Court decision.
If the Rowland case isn't
alarming enough, the Unborn Victims Of Violence Act has
just won approval in
the Senate. Next it goes to the desk of abortion rights hater
George W. Bush. The
bill establishes that violence against a pregnant woman can be
construed as two cimes.
One crime - that of violence inflicted directly upon the mother.
And the secondary crime
is the resulting harm to the fetus done upon injury to the
mother.
Therefore, the fetus
- at any stage of development - can be considered a victim
of a crime. There
is no limit to the potential abuses of this act once it is signed into
law.
The mother and fetus
are treated as equals, when they are in effect not equals.
An
unborn child is NOT a living, breathing, independent, human being.
And it is
statutes such as the
Unborn
Victims of Violence Act that while well-intentioned on
some level, are just
backdoor methods to establashing under principle of law, that unborn
fetuses are real persons
and therefore cannot be aborted.
The bell is tolling upon
Roe Vs. Wade. -- Loud and clear.
ReadingPost.Com
© Copyright
2004
_______________________________
Liberal
Rights Announcement Group
Enjoy
this article? Subscribe to our list and
have
our latest liberal rants delivered right
to
your mailbox. We will never SPAM
you.
Comments
about this article? Send to editor.
Would
you like to republish this article? Ask,
and
we'll send along our republishing guidelines.
Comments
sent to editor may be republished
on
our site or in our announcement list at our
discretion.
Comments containing crude language
and/or
vulgarites will be deleted and your
email
address permanently banned.
_______________________________
Detective
Service Or Detective Software?
Your
Choice...
Net
Detective Software
Web
Detective Service
_______________________________
ARTICLE
SEARCH:
use
keywords or phrases to locate
other
ReadingPost.Com
articles
_______________________________
_______________________________
ReadingPost.Com: Home
Page
Previous
Article | Next Article
letters
to the editor | archives1
| archives2 | donate
|
link directory
| liberal rights
_______________________________
|